Skip to main content

Semtech’s Corporate Blog

Protection of Surveillance Cameras from Lightning Surges

Circuit Protection

Anindita Bhattacharya

Anindita Bhattacharya

Principal Solutions Architect

Surveillance cameras have become ubiquitous in today's world. Whether we're taking a morning jog in the neighborhood, escorting our children to school or commuting to work, chances are security cameras are monitoring us. Americans are captured on security cameras about 238 times weekly. The widespread adoption of security cameras on both private and public properties is on the rise, primarily due to ease of installation and the sense of safety they offer. Once set up, cameras promptly begin recording images and videos, allowing authorized users to access real-time video feeds over the internet via smartphones or other devices. 

Surveillance cameras are typically outdoor and expected to operate flawlessly for many years with minimal upkeep. These cameras must maintain accurate performance despite the challenging outdoor conditions and remain resilient against threats like electrostatic discharge (ESD), electrical fast transient (EFT) and surges due to lightning strikes and electrical switching. Ensuring the enduring dependability of surveillance cameras necessitates a comprehensive understanding of relevant standards and the thoughtful incorporation of transient protection devices that align with those safety standards.

IEC Standards for ESD, EFT and Surge Protection

The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), a global organization dedicated to fostering international collaboration in the realm of standardization for electrical and electronic industries, has formulated transient immunity standards that now serve as essential benchmarks for manufacturers. These standards encompass the three primary guidelines aimed at addressing diverse transient surges:

1.    IEC 61000-4-2: This standard focuses on ESD in electronic applications, considering the system-level impact within an end-user environment. Click here for a detailed overview of this standard.

2.    IEC 61000-4-4: This standard assesses the equipment's ability to withstand recurring electrical fast transients and bursts.

3.    IEC 61000-4-5: This standard addresses the most severe transient conditions caused by lightning strikes and switching surges on both power and data lines.

In this blog, we will delve into the IEC 61000-4-5 standard and explore how to safeguard electrical components used in security cameras for data/signal lines against lightning and surge transients per this standard. 

IEC 61000-4-5

IEC 61000-4-5 outlines the procedures and methodologies for conducting surge immunity testing of any equipment under test (EUT). We can begin by defining what a surge is. A surge is a short-lived, high-energy voltage and current spike, sometimes triggered by electrical switching or lightning. Unlike ESD and EFT events, surges persist longer and contain higher energy levels.  

IEC 61000-4-5  addresses transient conditions on power and data/signal lines. Switching transients can arise from various factors, including power system switches, alterations in power distribution loads, short-circuit faults, or instances of distributed ground caused by electrical arcing. Lightning-related transients can occur due to direct strikes on outdoor equipment, induced voltage and current from electromagnetic fields resulting from indirect lightning strikes or ground disturbances from lightning coupled to the entire grounding system.

Surge Generator or Combination Waveform Generator (CWG)

The IEC 61000-4-5 standard defines a test setup to simulate a surge or transient scenario, a transient entry point to the EUT, and a set of installation conditions. The main idea is to create waveforms that closely resemble real-world surge events. The transient is defined as a surge generator or Combination Waveform Generator (CWG) producing a given waveform and having a specified open circuit voltage and source impedance.  There are two combination waveforms defined by the IEC 61000-4-5:

•    1.2/50µs combination wave (1.2/50µs into open circuit and 8/20µs into short circuit)
•    10/700µs combination wave (10/700µs into open circuit and 5/320µs into short circuit)

The 10/700µs combination wave generator is used to test ports intended for connection to outdoor symmetrical communication lines. In this blog, we will discuss only 1.2/50µs combination wave generators. A simplified schematic of the surge generator for a 1.2/50µs combination wave is shown in Figure 1. 

Figure1-2Figure 1. Simplified circuit diagram of the combination waveform generator (1.2/50 µS & 8/20 µS)

Figure 1. Simplified circuit diagram of the combination waveform generator (1.2/50 µS & 8/20 µS)

 

The CWG, as per the IEC 61000-4-5 standard, uses a test setup that simulates the characteristics of a surge as both a voltage waveform and a current waveform. In Figure 1, the high-voltage source charges the capacitor CC, via a resistor RC. When the capacitor Cc is charged, the switch S1 delivers the energy into the network created by RS1, RS2, RM and LR. RS1 and RS2 are the pulse duration shaping resistors, RM is the impedance matching resistor and LR is the rise time shaping inductor. Component values are chosen intentionally to ensure they produce a defined voltage surge into an open circuit and a defined surge current into a short circuit. The two waveforms exhibit variations in both their rise times and durations. The voltage waveform shown in Figure 2 (a) has a rise time of 1.2µs and a half-length of 50µs. The current waveform has a rise time of 8µs and a half-length of 20µs. The test setup delivers a 1.2µs/50µs voltage waveform when the outputs are open, and it provides an 8µs/20µs current waveform when the outputs are short.

 

combined-chart of waveform open-circuit voltage

                                    (a)                                                                                                                         (b)

Figure 2. Waveform of  (a) open-circuit voltage (1.2/50µs)  (b) short-circuit current (8/20µs) (Source)

The critical factor in generating these waveforms lies in the choice of components for the circuit depicted in Figure 1. To simplify matters, one convention that has been adopted is the determination of the generator's effective output impedance. This definition is based on the ratio between the highest open-circuit output voltage and the highest short-circuit current produced by the generator. In the case of CWG, this ratio indicates an effective output impedance of 2Ω. Essentially, this 2Ω signifies the impedance of the cable or any other connections within the system. The peak voltage typically ranges from 0.5kV to 4kV. Table 1 shows the relationship between the peak short-circuit current and peak open-circuit voltage.

 

Table1- Relation between peak short circuit current and open circuit voltage

Table 1: Relation between peak short circuit current and open circuit voltage

 

Coupling/Decoupling Network

The IEC 61000-4-5 standard outlines various coupling/decoupling networks, which are tools designed to couple or transfer the voltage surge generated by the CWG to the EUT while isolating or decoupling it from the facility power supply. The objective is to safeguard the network of the EUT by mitigating the impact of surges and excessive voltage on other connected devices. When coupling the CWG to the EUT, the output impedance can be much higher than 2Ω in several circumstances. The determination of this factor relies on the specific applications, whether it involves a signal line or a power supply network, as well as the location of the surge impact. IEC 61000-4-5 provides guidelines about the selection of external coupling networks. The reason for adding an external resistor is to reduce the energy in the applied surge. When conducting surge tests on signal or communication lines (unshielded, unsymmetrical interconnection lines) a coupling network consists of a 40Ω external resistor as shown in Figure 3. This configuration yields a source impedance of 42Ω, which comprises the sum of the external resistor (REXT=40Ω) and the inherent impedance (ROUT=2Ω). In Figure 3, the CD denotes coupling devices that guarantee adequate insulation between the interconnection lines and the CWG while facilitating the efficient transmission of the surge impulse. Any coupling device, whether it be capacitors or gas discharge tubes (GDT), which can fulfill the requirements for coupling and insulation, is suitable for use.

Figure 3 Test Strip for coupling network

Figure 3. Test setup for coupling network for unshielded unsymmetrical interconnection lines:

line-to-line and line-to-earth coupling

 

When a directly coupled surge event affects the input of any EUT with severe current, the components within the circuit board connected to the signal lines experience an inductively coupled attenuated surge current. To illustrate, if the CWG is charged to 500V, the coupling network will generate a peak current of 500V/2Ω, resulting in a substantial 250A surge that the EUT will experience at its power input. However, the signal line encounters a peak current of 500V/42Ω, resulting in a 12A surge. Therefore, the source impedance of 42Ω plays a significant role in attenuating the peak current while keeping the surge voltage constant.

 

Figure4-1 Test setup for coupling network for unshielded system

Figure 4. Test setup for coupling network for unshielded symmetrical interconnection lines: line-to-earth coupling

Figure 4 illustrates the test arrangement for coupling and decoupling networks used to subject unshielded, symmetrical interconnection lines to surges. When coupling with symmetrical interconnection lines or twisted pairs, the coupling occurs in a common mode, meaning it affects all lines in relation to the ground. The energy transfer from the surge generator to the EUT is considered to be a constant, irrespective of the number of lines in the cable, and is equivalent to a coupling impedance of approximately 40Ω. This equivalent coupling impedance is distributed among the lines within the cable, and that is why the value of the coupling resistor employed on each line is a multiple of 40Ω. For example, each resistor in Figure 4 will be 160Ω, so the total equivalent REXT is 40Ω.

Transient Stress Levels and Surge Currents

Having gained an understanding of the CWG circuit and the coupling/decoupling network for signal line test configurations, the last piece of information we seek regarding the IEC 61000-4-5 standard pertains to the transient stress levels and surge currents. Installation classes define transient stress levels for each entry point into any system. The IEC 61000-4-5 standard delineates various classes based on the equipment's installation location, with each class having an associated peak voltage requirement. The definition of the six installation classes is shown in Table 2. The equipment generally requires transient surge protection if it belongs to installation class 1 or confronts at least a 500V surge and above.

 

Class Environment Voltage Level
0
Well protected environment
25V
1
Partially protected environment
500V
2
An electrical environment where the cables are well-separated
1kV
3
An electrical environment where the power and signal cables run in parallel
2kV
4
Multi-wire cables for both electronic and electrical circuits
4kV
5
Electrical environment where pieces of equipment are connected to telecommunications cables and overhead power lines
(low-densely populated areas)
Test Level 4

Table 2: Installation classes and voltage levels

 

Tables 3a and 3b summarizes various threat levels on signal lines based on the installation class and coupling methods. It presents voltage stress values using the 1.2 x 50 µs waveform. For selecting suppression elements, it's more beneficial to consider the short-circuit current values. These short-circuit current stress levels are defined using the 8 x 20µs waveform.

 

 

Installation Class 

Unsymmetrical operated circuits/lines

External Port

Internal Port

Coupling mode:

Line-to-line 

Coupling mode:

Line-to-earth

Coupling mode:

Line-to-line

Coupling mode:

Line-to-earth

Voltage

Current

Voltage

Current

Voltage

Current

Voltage

Current

0

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

1

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

0.5kV

12A

2

NA

NA

NA

NA

0.5kV

12A

1kV

24A

3

NA

NA

NA

NA

1kV

24A

2kV

48A

4

2kV

48A

4kV

95A

2kV

48A

4kV

95A

5

2kV

48A

4kV

95A

2kV

48A

4kV

95A

 

 

Installation Class

Symmetrical operated circuits/lines

External Port

Internal Port

Coupling mode:

Line-to-line

Coupling mode:

Line-to-earth 

Coupling mode:

Line-to-line

Coupling mode:

Line-to-earth 

Voltage

Current

Voltage

Current

Voltage

Current

Voltage

Current

0

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

1

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

0.5V

12A

2

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

1kV

24A

3

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

2kV

48A

4

NA

NA

4kV

95A

NA

NA

4kV

95A

5

NA

NA

4kV

95A

NA

NA

4kV

95A

Tables 3a and 3b: IEC 61000-4-5 - selection of test levels on signal lines per installation classes

Shielding the Interfaces of Surveillance Cameras with Transient Suppression Devices

This blog initially addressed the increasing prevalence of outdoor surveillance camera usage. Having thoroughly explored surge events and the IEC 61000-4-5 standard for signal lines, let's examine methods to safeguard the ports and interfaces of a surveillance camera from surges and other EOS events.

The typical suppression element required, as per the IEC 61000-4-5 standard, is a clamping device placed in parallel with the circuit that needs protection. In power supply or VBus applications, high-power devices are often necessary. Depending on the specific application and the position of the component in the circuit board (whether at the input or middle of the board), one might need either an individual discrete device or an assembled solution. Transient Voltage Suppression (TVS) diodes stand out due to their exceptional clamping voltage characteristics and rapid response time for safeguarding data or signal lines and providing secondary board-level protection. The objective of any transient suppression device is to endure the surge current and protect the electrical circuit by constraining the surge voltage to a level below the circuit's maximum allowable voltage.

The TVS diodes respond promptly to voltage surges, clamping the surge to a specified value before entering the circuit— clamping voltage (VCL). When a transient event occurs, the TVS diode transforms into a low-impedance device, redirecting the transient surge current away from the circuit and providing essential protection. The surge current capability is specified as peak pulse current (IPP) in the datasheets of the TVS diodes.

Figure5- Block Diagram of surveillance camera and its interfaces

Figure 5. Block diagram of a surveillance camera and its interfaces

Figure 5 shows a typical surveillance camera's block diagram with interfaces that need protection from electrical overstress events, including ESDs and surges. Table 4 lists the transient protection devices to shield the ports and interfaces of a surveillance camera, sensors, servers, and other devices from electrical transients, electrical overstress (EOS) and ESD events (Figure 5).

 Interface to Protect

Part Number

 # of Lines

 Configuration

 VRWM

 ESD Rating Contact/Air

 Surge Rating (8/20µs)

 Clamping Voltage (8/20µs)

 Cap (Max)

 Package Dimensions

Antenna

RClamp®2261PW 

1

Bidirectional

22V

±25kV/±30kV

18A

15V

0.5pF

DFN (1.0x0.6x0.55mm)

Speaker

µClamp®5031PW

1

Bidirectional

5V

±30kV/±30kV

7.5A

9.2V

15pF

DFN (1.0x0.6x0.55mm)

Memory

µClamp03351PW

1

Bidirectional

5V

±20kV/±30kV

6A

6.5V

7pF

DFN (1.0x0.6x0.55mm)

HD-HDI

RClamp03391PW

1

Bidirectional

3.3V

±8kV/±15kV

7A

5.3V

0.25pF

DFN (1.0x0.6x0.55mm)

Side button

µClamp03351PW

1

Bidirectional

5V

±20kV/±30kV

6A

6.5V

7pF

DFN (1.0x0.6x0.55mm)

Sensors

RClamp3371ZC 

1

Bidirectional

3.3V

±10kV/±17kV

9A

5.4V

0.25pF

DFN (0.6x0.3x0.25mm)

RS-485

TClamp®1202P

2

Bidirectional

12V

±15kV/±20kV

100A

40V

12pF

DFN (1.6x1.6x0.55mm)

USB 2.0

RClamp04041PW

1

Bidirectional

4.0V

±30kV/±30kV

20A

8V

0.65pF

DFN (1.0x0.6x0.55mm)

PoE

TDS5801P

1

Unidirectional

58V

±15kV/±20kV

20A

70.2V

72.8pF

DFN (1.6x1.6x0.55mm)

Ethernet

RClamp3374N

4

Bidirectional

3.3V

±30kV/±30kV

40A

25V

5pF

DFN (3.0x2.0x0.6mm)

Table 4: ESD and surge protection devices for surveillance cameras per interfaces and ports

Conclusion

Power over Ethernet (PoE), simplified installation, and enhanced data communication with portable devices have collectively contributed to the widespread adoption of surveillance cameras in various outdoor locations. Given the extensive use of this device, it becomes imperative to ensure robust protection for every interface, data connection, and communication port against ESD and surge-related EOS threats reliably over the installation's lifetime. In most instances, a TVS diode offers dependable protection over an extended period. Nevertheless, due to outdoor surveillance cameras' exposure and associated cables to lightning and switching surge hazards, a meticulous choice of transient suppression devices becomes essential. Semtech, a prominent manufacturer of EOS protection products, adheres to IEC 61000-4-5 standards for surge protection and IEC 61000-4-2 standards for electrostatic discharge (ESD) in the signal lines of surveillance camera designs. Our trusted TVS products have been the choice for many popular surveillance cameras worldwide. Contact Semtech while designing your circuit for a surveillance camera and protect it from EOS events in the data/signal lines.

 

CONTACT SALES

 

Semtech, the Semtech logo, RClamp, TClamp and µClamp are registered trademarks or service marks of Semtech Corporation or its subsidiaries. 

 

 

Related Blogs:

Posts by Author

See all